Updates the ADR log, architecture, limitations, perf table and README to match what now exists, rather than what was expected. **The perf number was wrong and is now honest.** The M0 figure of 0.279 MB excluded SQLite entirely — the placeholder binary never referenced the crate, so dead-code elimination dropped it. With the daemon actually opening a database it is **1.364 MB**, of which bundled SQLite is ~1.1 MB. That is 1.1 MB of the 5 MB budget spoken for, leaving 3.8 MB for D-Bus, X11 and a UI toolkit. This is the first number that makes the section 5 budget feel like a budget rather than a formality, and it turns ADR-4's bundled-vs-system-linked choice into a real trade-off with a measured price on both sides. - ADR-4 marked accepted and implemented, with that trade-off left open. - ARCHITECTURE.md documents why `blocker-storage` is a sibling crate and not a submodule: the dependency direction is what keeps the zero-dependency purity proof automatic rather than a grep someone can route around. - LIMITATIONS.md drops the stale "storage has no I/O" shortfall and records the bundled-vs-system question instead, plus the fact that `LockState` still always evaluates to Normal. - README status table and layout updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.2 KiB
Performance
Two tables. Targets are from CLAUDE.md section 5 and are fixed. Results is what was actually measured, and it is currently almost empty because almost nothing is built yet.
The separation is deliberate. A single table mixing aspiration with measurement invites reading the aspiration as the result.
Targets (CLAUDE.md section 5)
| Metric | Android | Windows / Linux daemon |
|---|---|---|
| Idle CPU | ~0% (no wakeups without events) | ~0%, ≤ 1 wakeup/min when idle |
| Idle RAM | ≤ 30 MB PSS | ≤ 15 MB RSS (daemon), UI process exits when its window closes |
| Block latency (foreground change → block shown) | ≤ 150 ms | ≤ 150 ms |
| Daemon binary | — | ≤ 5 MB stripped |
| APK size | ≤ 10 MB (release, R8) | — |
| Battery | no wakelocks outside active enforcement | — |
The release profile in the workspace Cargo.toml carries opt-level = "z", LTO,
codegen-units = 1, panic = "abort", and strip = true, which is what makes the
size budget reachable. scripts/size-check.sh enforces it in CI from the first
commit.
Results
Measured on: Ubuntu 26.04 LTS, KDE Plasma 6.6.6, 6 CPUs. Toolchain: rustc 1.98.1.
| Metric | Target | Measured | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daemon binary (stripped, release) | ≤ 5 MB | 1.364 MB | 2026-10-01, M1 |
| Block latency | ≤ 150 ms | not measured | — |
| Idle CPU | ~0% | not measured | — |
| Idle RAM (daemon) | ≤ 15 MB RSS | not measured | — |
| Idle wakeups | ≤ 1/min | not measured | — |
| APK size | ≤ 10 MB | not measured | — |
What the 1.364 MB contains, and why it matters. That figure is with bundled
SQLite linked in and the daemon actually opening a database — not the 0.279 MB
placeholder from M0, which was two println! lines and excluded SQLite entirely
through dead-code elimination.
So the honest read is: bundled SQLite costs roughly 1.1 MB of a 5 MB budget. That leaves 3.8 MB for D-Bus, X11, and the UI toolkit. It is a real constraint rather than a comfortable margin, and it is the first number that makes the section 5 budget feel like a budget instead of a formality.
It also makes ADR-4 (rusqlite bundled vs system-linked) a genuine trade-off rather than a settled one: system-linking would recover most of that 1.1 MB at the cost of a runtime dependency on the host's libsqlite3. Recorded as an open question.
How to measure
Linux daemon
# Binary size — the gate CI runs
scripts/size-check.sh
# Idle RSS
./systemctl --user start blocker
ps -o rss= -C blocker-daemon | awk '{printf "%.1f MB\n", $1/1024}'
# Idle CPU — sample over a minute, not instantaneously
pidstat -p "$(pidof blocker-daemon)" 10 6
# Block latency — timestamp on the compositor event, timestamp on the window map
# TODO: script this in M2-Linux once the KWin backend emits both.
perf stat -e context-switches,cpu-migrations is useful for the wakeup count. If
idle wakeups exceed one per minute, a timer is firing that next_wakeup did not
ask for — that is the first thing to look for.
Windows
Process Explorer, or ETW. The relevant counters are working set (RAM) and the process's CPU over a sampled window.
Android
adb shell dumpsys meminfo vu.valiq.blocker # PSS, must be <= 30 MB
adb shell dumpsys batterystats vu.valiq.blocker
adb shell am profile start --sampling 1 vu.valiq.blocker /data/local/tmp/p
Perfetto for the wakeup analysis. A wakeup from the blocked package when nothing is
happening is a bug in next_wakeup accounting, and battery stats will show it
long before a user complains.
Why idle is hard, and what breaks it
The budget is zero idle wakeups, so the common causes are worth naming.
- A timer that fires to check something. The engine's job is to make these
unnecessary. Every condition that contributes a
next_wakeupboundary is a deliberate, named commitment. A new timer that does not correspond to a boundary is a bug. - Conditions that should contribute no boundary but do. Wi-Fi and location
schedules are changed by OS events — NetworkManager's callback, the geofencing
API. Arming a timer for them would be a wakeup for nothing.
wifi_schedule_declares_no_time_wakeuppins this. - The UI holding a GL context. A resident graphics context costs both RAM and compositor wakeups. This is why the daemon and the block window are separate processes: the window exits when the block lifts, and nothing holds a context while idle.
- Unbounded
Vecgrowth in the engine.blocked_appsis rebuilt per evaluation. With a handful of schedules it is small, but a schedule set in the thousands would allocate per focus event.next_wakeupreturningNonemeans the daemon is asleep and this does not matter, which is exactly why the budget and the design reinforce each other. - Storage polling. Nothing in the design polls the database. If a future change introduces it, it will show up here first.
Recording a result
Add a row to the table above with the date and the tool used. Then note in the commit message whether the change touches the hot path — section 9 requires a re-measurement when it does.
A milestone is not done until its acceptance checks pass and its numbers are recorded here (section 7).